Monday, November 30, 2009

What made "Love Actually" such a box office hit? Version Z - 2nd Draft




Richard Curtis’ film, ‘Love Actually’, follows many relationships in the five weeks running up to Christmas, in London, England. It tackles issues such as infidelity, parental love, lovers of different ages, lovers who can’t speak the same language, lovers from different social classes, young love, lust, unconditional love, mourning the death of a loved one and how opposites very often attract!

What is it about this film that has led it to such huge success?

Arguably, one of the most impressive aspects of this film is its ability to make you laugh out loud one minute, and then well up with tears the next. As Nev Pierce of the BBC says in his review of the film, “You can almost see Curtis pressing the emotional buttons, but he does it so well you won't care.”

The film uses a slew of the most talented and highly acclaimed British actors, including Emma Thompson, Hugh Grant, Liam Neeson, Colin Firth, Alan Rickman, Keira Knightley and Rowan Atkinson. Having the likes of Hugh Grant and Colin Firth surely helped to publicise the film, and one could suggest that this contributed to the high profits the film made.

Another contributing factor to the success of the film could be that ‘Love Actually’ was the first film that Richard Curtis had directed in addition to having written it. Curtis was able to express the precise purpose of each scene by directing his writing, giving greater depth to the piece than if it had been directed by someone else.

Some critics have frowned upon the fact that there are so many lead characters in this film, and with that, there are numerous plots which are only very loosely intertwined. Its advocates would argue that this is the very beauty of the film - the movie is more about the characters and their personal experiences with love, than it is about a complicated, long evolving plot.

As the many story lines evolve throughout the film, Curtis plays with different social classes, ages and cultures, highlighting the fact that ultimately all human beings are the same – we all have the ability to fall in love, we all have the ability to care for others and show compassion for one another, and we all fear during some point in our life that we will never find true love or that we are in some way inadequate to the one we love. ‘Love Actually’ explores the different types of love and highlights the fact that all love can be challenging, and raises the ultimate question - is love always worth fighting for?

Not everyone enjoyed the film and was impressed by Curtis’ writing. There is a review on Tiscali.com which suggests that certain scenes and characters in 'Love Actually' are unoriginal and repetitive of some of Curtis’ previous works. However, one has to wonder, is that not the reason why Curtis used them?... he was using a recipe that had been tried and tested and was almost guaranteed to produce another hit romantic comedy. This is an extract from the review on Tiscali.com…

“There is a feeling that much of the material is simply regurgitating scenes from previous Working Title/Hugh Grant collaborations: Love is all Around from Four Weddings is overplayed; a zany Rhys Ifans character from Notting Hill pops up here and there, and once again the film ends with Grant making a fool of himself on stage in a school (About A Boy). And it's time to declare a moratorium on scenes where solitary characters break into dance - funny for the first ten times in The Full Monty, but actually a bit embarrassing here.”



Love it or hate it, no one can dispute the fact that “Love Actually” was a phenomenal box office success. In the opening weekend 'Love Actually' made over $6.89M in the USA alone, and has current estimated total earnings of $239,200,000 worldwide (as of 30.11.2009, based upon the information posted on IMDb Pro).

7 comments:

  1. Hi guys,
    Please let me know your thoughts on this updated version.
    Thanks,
    LB

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is your academic piece as you have used sources of information throughout this piece to make me consider this. I think we can both agree that we have both at some point said in each others writing styles comments about our opinions and our opinions making our work one sided. I do feel that the academic pieces will naturally consist of our opinions as its academic and it can be an argument or information and it does just have to answer the question that we have decided. I think that the fact we have written them will make them slightly one sided as we have decided what to include in order to answer the question. Do you agree with what I mean? However after saying that I do think that you have not genralised the piece with just what you think because you have used sources that agree with the film been successful for example its huge box office takings and a quote suggesting that Love Actually is “unoriginal and repetitive”.

    I was wondering if your review from the BBC was referenced correctly as I can’t find in the module book a way to write television reviews? Does it not have to have a date or anything just so I know how to write it myself?

    I think your work has a good structure, I think its well written and found it interesting to read. Although I have watched Love Actually a numerous amount of times I have never actually thought about the fact that all human beings are the same and that we all have the ability to fall in love, we all have the ability to care for others and show compassion for one another, as well as fear during some point in our life that we will never find true love or that we are in some way inadequate to the one we love. I think that the paragraph where you have mentioned this is really interesting, strong and made me wonder. Ideally what you want people to do when they read it. Good.

    I have posted a new draft of my marketing and descriptive piece I would appreciate it if you could read it and let me know what you think. I have also replied to your comment to my academic piece and would like to know what you think.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Abbi,
    Thanks so much for your feedback. I will have a look at your blog and all your pieces today and get back to you on them. I look forward to reading them.
    I will read up on the handbook about the TV reviews - thanks for bringing that to my attention.
    LB

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you. Yes i did read the handbook but couldnt relate it to an example as it is a report.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Laura-Beth this V2 has the nuetral stance more associated with academic writing... The reference for the BBC is ok - is there a specific source - you could always add a reference at the end if you are using the Harvard style in the writing - this would indicate where and when his review was written... in a short piece like this there would not be many references because your own writing would be swamped and we would loose your voice. That is what citing and referencing is for, to identify the sources for your audience and to 'back up' wht you say...the Tiscali source is harder to identify - who said this and why? It is quite a large quote - can you cut it down to any main points? Soes it take up word-count for a reason? What message do you think it conveys? Good editing process and Abbi's comments helpful. Paula

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for the advice Paula. I was actually thinking of reducing or even cutting that long quote. Interesting that you suggested the same thing. I will look over it again. I will also make my references more detailed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Laura,
    I really enjoyed reading this piece, its very well structures, researched, and most importantly clear.
    It’s easy to read and all of the facts and quotes are relevant to your original question.

    Why is it such a huge success?
    This is a very good question, but within this text it isn’t answered, I would like to see how at the end in conclusion and after sharing us with so many interesting facts about this movie, what you think the reason is, you can use these facts to back you up, or even narrow the choices of what its success is, which factor do you think influenced its sales more?

    This is your academic piece as referencing occurs, and at the beginning you make it clear that you are trying to answer a specific question, however in some parts of the text I feel like it is very descriptive, you just state a fact but don’t then use it back up an opinion.
    Maybe you can link some of them to the title?


    Not everyone enjoyed the film and was impressed by Curtis’ writing, so why is it this movie, which doesn’t appeal to all audiences has outsold so many other movies?

    Or something along those lines.

    The images within the academic text help a lot, as they remind us exactly what we are reading about, and gives a feel to the movie, which saves you having to describe to the reader what type of movie this is.

    What is your opinion on this text? Do you agree with all the reviews you have quoted from? Where they right to say what they said or unfair?

    I like the fact that you have a little conclusion at the end, but maybe the tremendous fact of just how much this movie has sold could be nearer the beginning, so as we see why its such a big deal!

    Great work here
    It was a pleasure to read

    Hope your having a nice holiday

    Kind regards

    Donna
    x

    ReplyDelete