Friday, December 11, 2009

What made "Love Actually" such a box office hit? Academic - 4th Draft



Richard Curtis’ film, "Love Actually", follows many relationships in the five weeks running up to Christmas, in London, England. It tackles issues such as infidelity, parental love, lovers of different ages, lovers who can’t speak the same language, lovers from different social classes, young love, lust, unconditional love, mourning the death of a loved one and how opposites very often attract!

What is it about this film that has led it to such huge success?

Arguably, one of the most impressive aspects of this film is its ability to make you laugh out loud one minute, and then well up with tears the next. As Nev Pierce writes in his review of the film on the BBC website “You can almost see Curtis pressing the emotional buttons, but he does it so well you won't care."

The film uses a slew of the most talented and highly acclaimed British actors, including Emma Thompson, Hugh Grant, Liam Neeson, Colin Firth, Alan Rickman, Keira Knightley and Rowan Atkinson. Having the likes of Hugh Grant and Colin Firth surely helped to publicise the film, and one could suggest that this contributed to the high profits the film made.

Another contributing factor to the success of the film could be that "Love Actually" was the first film that Richard Curtis had directed in addition to having written it. Curtis was able to express the precise purpose of each scene by directing his writing, giving greater depth to the piece than if it had been directed by someone else.

Some critics have frowned upon the fact that there are so many lead characters in this film, and with that, there are numerous plots which are only very loosely intertwined. Its advocates would argue that this is the very beauty of the film - the movie is more about the characters and their personal experiences with love, than it is about a complicated, long evolving plot. Roger Ebert, the highly acclaimed journalist for the Chicago Sun-Times, highlights this very debate in his review of the film, writing, "The movie's only flaw is also a virtue: It's jammed with characters, stories, warmth and laughs, until at times Curtis seems to be working from a checklist of obligatory movie love situations and doesn't want to leave anything out."

As the many story lines evolve throughout the film, Curtis plays with different social classes, ages and cultures, highlighting the fact that ultimately all human beings are the same – we all have the ability to fall in love, we all have the ability to care for others and show compassion for one another, and we all fear during some point in our life that we will never find true love or that we are in some way inadequate to the one we love. "Love Actually" explores the different types of love and highlights the fact that all love can be challenging, and raises the ultimate question - is love always worth fighting for?

Not everyone enjoyed the film and was impressed by Curtis’ writing. Numerous reviews of the film suggest that certain scenes and characters in "Love Actually" are unoriginal and repetitive of some of Curtis’ previous works. However, one has to wonder, is that not the reason why Curtis used them?... he was using a recipe that had been tried and tested and was almost guaranteed to produce another hit romantic comedy.



Love it or hate it, no one can dispute the fact that “Love Actually" was a phenomenal box office success. In the opening weekend "Love Actually" made over $6.89M in the USA alone, and has current estimated total earnings of $239,200,000 worldwide (as of 30.11.2009, based upon the information posted on www.imdbpro.com).

References:

Ebert, R, 2003, "Love Actually". Chicago Sun-Times [Online] 7th November, Available from: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20031107/REVIEWS/311070304/1023 [accessed 14th December 2009]

Pierce, N, 2003, "Movies - Love Actually", BBC Website [Online], 20th November, Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2003/11/06/love_actually_2003_review.shtml [accessed 14th December 2009]

2003, "Love Actually 2003", IMDb Pro 30th November 2009 Available from: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0314331/ [accessed 30th November 2009]

3 comments:

  1. Hi guys,

    I have removed the hyperlinks and used the Harvard system of referencing, to improve the clarity of the blog.

    I have also removed the reference from Tiscalli.com as I discovered that Tiscalli is not always a reliable source of information. I have added a reference from the Chicago Sun-Times from an article written by a top journalist in the filed of film reviews, so I believe this will carry more weight in its reliability.

    Please let me know your thoughts.

    Paula, please could you let me know if I have used the Harvard system correctly?

    Thanks,

    Laura-Beth

    ReplyDelete
  2. Laura- Beth

    first 2 refs look to form - in the last one - if something is from an organisation but you don't know the author - you generally cite to the organisation - so IMDb - I have to do this when I cite government publications - then year - then specific cite " site" the the rest. (I remember seeing one Harvard source that did it differently but I think that was a one off - with any style system it is just a matter of trying to be consistent within the document)

    Websites can be terrifically long - cutting and pasting - but it is easy to make mistakes typing them out - especially when the point is to provide the reader with a place to access the info...

    Paula

    Paula

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Paula,

    Thanks for the advice. It has helped me to produce the Final Version!

    Laura-Beth

    ReplyDelete